<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scots: local dialect or historical language?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yeasir.com/blog/2009/02/scots-local-dialect-or-historical-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yeasir.com/blog/2009/02/scots-local-dialect-or-historical-language/</link>
	<description>Web Localization, i18n, Web 2.0, Culture, Translation 2.0, New Media and New Tech....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.yeasir.com/blog/2009/02/scots-local-dialect-or-historical-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yeasir.com/blog/?p=215#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>Good post. It often becomes very difficult to differentiate between a language and a dialect. My view had been that if a language has sufficient history and have a rich literature it should be considered a separate language rather than a dialect. Thus Scots certainly deserve to be a separate language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. It often becomes very difficult to differentiate between a language and a dialect. My view had been that if a language has sufficient history and have a rich literature it should be considered a separate language rather than a dialect. Thus Scots certainly deserve to be a separate language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.yeasir.com/blog/2009/02/scots-local-dialect-or-historical-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yeasir.com/blog/?p=215#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>Had no idea about Scots.Thanks for info!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had no idea about Scots.Thanks for info!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordie Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.yeasir.com/blog/2009/02/scots-local-dialect-or-historical-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordie Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yeasir.com/blog/?p=215#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I had no idea that there was a language called Scots. Thanks for enlightening me, Jianjun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I had no idea that there was a language called Scots. Thanks for enlightening me, Jianjun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

